Skip to content

More Than Proofreading: Four Levels of Editing

  • by
Four levels of editing

Traditionally, a book goes through four levels of editing, sometimes multiple rounds at each level. It’s important to understand what is done at each level so that you know how to hire the right editor. Whether you are revising a manuscript to prepare it for agents and publishers or for self-publishing, take some time to learn the four levels of editing and which type of editor you need.

Different freelance editors structure their businesses differently. Some offer all levels of editing, some specialize, and there is even variation among editors as to the definition of each level. Some editors combine editing tasks as well. It is possible to do substantive editing at the same time as line editing, or line editing at the same time as copyediting.

Whatever your editing needs are, make sure you and your editor communicate clearly about what is going to be done. Better yet, get a sample edit.

I use examples here from fiction writing, but much of this applies to nonfiction as well.  

Substantive

This is the big-picture editing. It’s sometimes also called content, developmental, or structural editing. An editor doing this type of editing looks at the major revisions that need to be done before getting into the nitty-gritty details of grammar, punctuation, and word choice, though if there are grammar or punctuation mistakes made repeatedly throughout the manuscript, a substantive editor will point them out. But that’s not the main focus. The focus is on the organization of the content.

For fiction, character and plot are key. This means looking at each important character’s goals, motivations, and conflicts; consistency in character traits and voice; pacing; and plot structure. Is there unavoidable internal and external conflict? Does each scene move the plot forward? Are there moments of irrelevant backstory or information dumps? Does the beginning of each chapter hook the reader and the end of each chapter prompt the reader to keep going? Are the promises made at the beginning of the story fulfilled by the end?

A substantive editor also looks for problems in fiction writing techniques such as point-of-view slips (head hopping), impossible dialogue tags (no one can actually hiss, shrug, or chuckle words), filter words that tell instead of show the reader what characters are experiencing (seemed, looked, felt, etc.), and prose that overexplains. Whole books have been written on the craft of fiction writing, and substantive editors have studied (or written) many of them.

Line editing

Line editing focuses on the language used at the sentence and paragraph level. Clarity, flow, and tone are key. A line editor sifts line by line to make sure the author is making the most of every sentence to connect with the target audience. This turns writing that may be technically correct into content that is effective and engaging. It eliminates wordiness, redundancies, unnecessary modifiers, passive voice (unless that is the most effective choice), and ambiguity.

For fiction, a line editor also looks at some of the same fiction writing techniques that are covered by substantive editing. For example, a line editor would correct inappropriate dialogue tags, point out filter words that can be removed, and flag point-of-view slips, information dumps, floating body parts, and many other awkward issues that can trip up or distance readers. A line editor may point out character inconsistencies and plot holes, but the focus is more on the details—using pronouns where useful, avoiding clichés, and using appropriate comparisons, for example.

Copyediting

Copy editors are the grammar gurus. They’re the ones who can spot misplaced modifiers, awkward syntax, tense problems, words used out of context, or pronoun agreement mistakes in their sleep. Well, not really, but you get the idea.

They also point out items that may require permission from copyright holders and do basic fact checking. They know whether numbers should be spelled out, how to handle hyphenation, and whether serial commas should be used (or they can look it up in the appropriate style guide). Punctuation, word choice, grammar, and spelling are the focus. Consistency is key.

Proofreading

Proofreading got its name from the proofs that are the last version of a document before publication. Proofreaders look at punctuation, word choice, grammar, spelling, layout, and formatting, but they don’t rewrite sentences. They are the last set of eyes to catch any errors and typos that slip past the copyediting stage.

The biggest takeaway here is to do editing in order. During the substantive editing stage, you will be rewriting or deleting whole passages. There’s no point to wasting time and money paying a copy editor to correct grammar and style if there are still big-picture issues that need to be addressed.

For more help finding the right editor for you, see this post: Finding the Right Editor.

2 thoughts on “More Than Proofreading: Four Levels of Editing”

  1. Greetings Katy. (May I call you Katy?)

    Does punctuation go inside or outside of closing parentheses, e.g.(May I call you Katy?) or (May I call you Katy)?

    My name is Larry Janss. I am a retired oldster living in thousand Oaks, CA. where I was born and have I lived for 74 years. From my first moments through my 18th year, my “growing up” environment was the Conejo Ranch, a working cattle and thoroughbred racehorse ranch where I thrived during those emotional and evolutionary years.

    I have been writing as an amateur for 5 decades, mostly essays, short stories and flights of fancy, and putting them away into my cyber filing drawers. I am, currently, revisiting them, adjusting and expanding them, readying them for their close-ups. Close-ups is plural because I’m creating two volumes. The overarching title of my efforts is “The Colonel of Truth; the Semi-Fictional Autobiography of Larry Janss”. Soon, during reading, the reader will notice that the word “Colonel” is rather interchangeable with “Kernel”, to wit The Colonel of Truth is always peeking over my shoulder, seeking at least a kernel of truth in the autobiography.”

    Volume 1 is titled “The Ranch Stories” and tells of my experiences of growing up on The Conejo from my birth to the time the Ranch was forever closed for business after 180 years of continual productivity. My family “ranched” the Ranch from 1910 until 1968. Volume 1 is (currently) 22,500 words long.

    Volume 2 is mostly written and is currently coming in at 24,500 words. It is/will be a mix of 10 or 11 works in all of the above listed genres, accompanied by photography.

    Volume 1 is around the last corner and heading fast towards the finish line. Or at least towards the line when I’ll be looking for help. Hence this letter.

    Perhaps the proof is in the pudding. As you see, it took me 354 words to, basically, say hello and to introduce myself. I am known as a guy who can take an idea worth 3 sentences and jam it into 20 pages.

    What do I do next?

    Best,

    Larry

    1. Hi, Larry, thanks for the questions! You likely need a developmental editor, particularly one who specializes in memoir. If you are in any writing groups (real-life groups or groups on social media), you can ask other writers for recommendations. Or you can go to the Editorial Freelancers Association’s website and search their member directory or post your project to the job list. It’s also a good idea to peruse books similar to yours. Many times, the editors of those books are listed on the copyright page or in the acknowledgments.

      (May I call you Katy?) is correct because the entire question is inside the parentheses, so the question mark needs to be as well. In my previous paragraph, I placed the comma outside the parentheses because it applied to the entire dependent clause, not just the phrase inside the parentheses.

      All the best!
      Katy

Comments are closed.